The Virus that Cried Wolf


The Lantern Vol. 37


My previous letter explained my concern with how medical information was suppressed during the 2020 pandemic year.


I am particularly disgusted where I see a duplicity in discussions. For example, on the day of President Biden's Inauguration the World health Organization changed how we test and record positive cases of CoronaVirus. This has led to a substantial reduction in active cases.


Lifesite news reported on this and provided direct links to their sources.


https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/covid-cases-plummet-after-who-changes-testing-protocol-on-bidens-inauguration-day

Magically the virus threat has lessened overnight, or at least the numbers have.

Now there is a push to return kids to school because their “science” shows it is now safe. I say “their” science because science seems to have become an arbitrary notion. Science for some has become a choice of what to believe. For example, the biological science that determines a male is no longer relevant if the male feels like a female and vice versa .

In July of 2020, the previous administration was taken to task by the New York Times and the Washington Post to name a few, over the idea of returning kids to school. Although the science showed kids were less vulnerable to Covid 19 and less likely to be carriers. That science was bad science, because it was another administration. Now, that science is good science and the kids can return to school safely.

The problem is that, those who wanted to keep the public fearful of the virus and offer little hope, convinced many in the public arena that it was unsafe. If it was not safe because of science then, which is the same science now, how is it safe now?

Now, let’s look at the mask debate. Masks have for the most part have been used in society for centuries to hide identities and to scare people. The idea that someone is hiding their true identity usually brings up a concern, a fear. Prior to Covid 19 you coud not wear a mask into a bank, after Covid 19 began you could not bank without wearing a mask.

The mask debate still rages on with many current studies suggesting cloth masks do nothing and in some cases cause harm.

https://swprs.org/face-masks-evidence/

Dr. Anthony Fauci, the nation's perceived expert, went from saying they do little good, to wearing two and three masks at once is best.

The average age of death in the world is 72.6 years in the United States is 78.54.

The greatest number of Covid deaths are 85 years and older; that's 32 percent of the deaths. The second most affected age group is 65-74 years and older which is 28 percent of the deaths and third group is 55-64 and older which represents 21 percent.

https://www.statista.com/statistics/1191568/reported-deaths-from-covid-by-age-us/

Therefore, around 81 percent of all people who have died were around the dying age of 72. My age group which is 55-64 accounts for 12 percent which is .00016 percent of the population. Thus, according to science the vast majority of people are safe from this virus, yet we shut down the world.

I find it ironic many of the same people who are exaggerating the severity of the virus to save humanity, also support birth control as a means to correct their perceived concept of “overpopulation.”

This virus is truly a natural solution to overpopulation concerns, yet they would support a vaccine to stop the virus and at the same time support a vaccine to sterilize people.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12346214/

I bring up all of these numbers because of the duplicity of the Centers for Disease Control and the World Health Organization.

We have counted just about anyone who has died as a victim of Covid 19, even though the vast majority were of the age to die naturally, or had other pre-existing conditions.

Yet, all of those who died from the new vaccine are people the CDC says would have died anyways. Some sources cite that the multiple deaths after receiving an experimental vaccine were from people with pre-existing conditions and question why would we count them? Then why did we not rule out all covid deaths with pre-existing conditions? The numbers would have dropped significantly.

Here are quotes from the following article which I linked.

"Based on the data that we have, we assume that the patients died of their underlying disease — in a coincidental time with the vaccination," she told German broadcaster n-tv. While she did not comment on individual cases, she said, "They were very seriously ill patients with many underlying diseases."

"If the elderly or people with severe pre-existing conditions are vaccinated, there will be a certain number of accidental deaths that occur shortly after vaccination, which cannot be causally associated with the vaccination. https://www.dw.com/en/fact-check-are-covid-19-vaccines-causing-deaths/a-56458746


The article considers the US Government's Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting Systems (VAERS) own data as not reliable.

I am simply pointing out that we are using opposite standards for reporting Covid deaths and Vaccine deaths. What is good for the goose should be good for the gander.

We hear a lot of talk about reaching herd immunity. The stage at which the population has built up enough immunity that a virus is no longer a threat.

Some suggest the lowest possible number is 70 percent of the population needs to be vaccinated or develop natural immunity. The CDC does not even know if our bodies will develop lasting immunity with or without the vaccine. Current data just does not indicate a lasting immunity.

https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/faq.html

Again, I like to look at the numbers. A recent Associated Press Poll shows 30 percent of the population is not considering the vaccine.

https://apnews.com/article/ap-norc-poll-3rd-adult-skeptical-vaccine-3779574a6d45d38cfc1d8615eb176b2d#:~:text=The%20poll%20from%20The%20Associated,the%20vaccine's%20safety%20and%20effectiveness.

But we are missing some other important numbers. The vaccine is not being given to anyone under the ages of 18. Most polling only includes older adults. 18 years and younger accounts for around 24 percent of the population. So how would we ever get to herd immunity if over 50 percent of the population (those under 18 and those who choose not to) do not participate in vaccination? Likewise, the vaccine does not claim to either protect someone from getting the virus or keep them from spreading it.

The fact sheet from Moderna given to caregivers says:


FACT SHEET FOR RECIPIENTS AND CAREGIVERS

EMERGENCY USE AUTHORIZATION (EUA) OF

THE MODERNA COVID-19 VACCINE TO PREVENT CORONAVIRUS DISEASE 2019 (COVID-19)

IN INDIVIDUALS 18 YEARS OF AGE AND OLDER


You are being offered the Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine to prevent Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by SARS-CoV-2. This Fact Sheet contains information to help you understand the risks and benefits of the Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine, which you may receive because there is currently a pandemic of COVID-19.


The Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine is a vaccine and may prevent you from getting COVID-19.

There is no U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved vaccine to prevent COVID-19.


Read this Fact Sheet for information about the Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine. Talk to the vaccination provider if you have questions. It is your choice to receive the Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine.


The Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine is administered as a 2-dose series, 1 month apart, into the muscle.


The Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine may not protect everyone.


This Fact Sheet may have been updated. For the most recent Fact Sheet, please visit www.modernatx.com/covid19vaccine-eua


(Please note, may prevent you and may not protect everyone.)



My point is simple, based on the science we might be doing nothing to prevent the spread or the virus or increase herd immunity.

Children are not receiving the vaccine so based on our previous strategy they can never go back to the classroom and possibly are always carriers.

We believe the immunity both natural and vaccine are temporary so unless we receive the vaccines on a continual basis even our best hopes are mislaid.

People who get the vaccine, still get the virus (though hopefully less severe) and can still be carriers.

We talk about science and completely ignore the facts and instead center our hopes on a vaccine that by its own data does nothing to stop the spread. We manipulate the tests to convince ourselves we have done something good.

All in all, we have made this virus many times worse than it is and have not truly confronted the facts, the science. Many cried big bad wolf at every corner, so people felt scared. Now they have to convince people the danger was never really as bad as they thought, and everyone can get back to normal.

In reality the threat is still there, and we can do very little about it. Those who hyped the virus for their own reasons have to act like something has changed.

They now have to convince those they deceived that it is now safe to come out, and that is proving to be a bigger problem than the virus itself.






George Foster

I am a Catholic Layman who has been fighting church corruption for over 15 years.

White Collar Crimes
My personal story is available on Amazon 
WHITE COLLAR CRIMES BOOK COVER 1 (1).jpg
Search By Tags
No tags yet.
  • Facebook Black Round
  • Google+ Black Round
  • Tumblr Black Round